Urban Growth, Information Technologies and The Pacific Rim
Introduction
Cities provide the meeting ground for the
face-to-face exchanges that generate trade and commerce. With the advent
of new communications technologies, many observers have questioned the
need for urban centers since electronic communications makes it possible
to sustain regular contact and information flows over great distances
without direct personal contact.
This article argues that communications
technologies, while fostering geographic dispersion, are also
strengthening a handful of principle world cities. The emerging
telecommunications infrastructure is allowing a relatively limited
number of cities to serve as gateways to new information-based goods and
services. To assess this urban development process, we examine three
factors effecting the growth of Pacific Rim urban centers.
1. How are multinational firms
influencing financial actives in the Pacific Rim.
2. How are fiber and satellite
communications systems affecting the development of Pacific Rim
financial Centers.
3. How are regulatory policies linked to
the development of these financial centers.
Cities, Financial Centers and the
Pacific Rim
The fusion of telecommunications and
computer technology allows private firms to operate across broad
geographic distances. Multinational firms depend on advanced
technologies to control and coordinate production, marketing and
financing on a global basis. By so doing, a multinational firm's
comparative advantage in either the production or processing of goods
and services can be fully exploited. For multinational service firms,
this comparative advantage often involves their proprietary access to
capital, timely information and/or managerial and organizational
expertise (Dunning and Norman, 1983).
The development of urban financial
centers, which encompass information intensive activities like finance,
law, accounting, management consulting and advertising. reflects the
fact that cities provide a path for multinational service firms to enter
new markets. As service firms expand globally, a handful of principal
cities are emerging as gateways that a) enable firms to access broader
markets and b) enable firms to efficiently control and coordinate their
international activities. As Noyelle and Stanback have noted in their
analysis of American cities, "…large and medium sized central places
[are] becoming increasingly specialized in the export of headquarters
and producer services that permit firms to organize, manage and control
production elsewhere (increasingly in production or consumer-oriented
centers)" (Noyelle and Stanback. 1983).
This phenomenon is demonstrated in the
United Stales by analyzing the location of foreign bank offices. 82% of
foreign banks agency, branch, and edge act offices arc located in the
cities of New York, Los Angeles, San Francisco, Chicago, and Miami. This
distribution is consistent with the role these cities play as gateways
to international trade and finance. Both San Francisco, with its
historic role as a center for financing the gold rush in the previous
century, and Los Angeles, whose expanding financial sector is in part
tied to the rapid growth in trade through the ports of Los Angeles and
Long Beach, are gateways to the Pacific Basin. In Chicago, the linking
of the Chicago Mercantile Exchange to the futures exchange in Singapore
underscores the internationalization of commodity trading. In Miami, the
rapid growth of foreign bank offices in this city reflects the increased
financial ties the United States has with Latin America, and the
dominance of New York City underscores its being a world center for
banking and securities activities.
Further, it is important to recognize
that the global distribution of offices in cities is not a proxy for the
location of capital or corporate decision making: rather. it is simply a
proxy for where firms can most efficiently coordinate or market goods
and services on a global basis. In fact, the location of capital for
foreign banks operating in the U.S. is highly concentrated in New York
City, which contains 91% of foreign bank branch deposits (American
Banker. 1986).
Financial Centers in the Pacific Rim
The major financial centers in the
Pacific Rim are Tokyo, Hong Kong. Singapore, and (to a lesser extent)
Sydney. In addition to serving as the primary points of entry for
financial institutions wishing to access markets found in these cities,
these centers also serve as the primary points for the administrative
control and coordination of a firm's Pacific Rim activity. As a result,
the concentration of multinational service activity in these centers is
far more intense and dynamic than other Pacific Rim cities.
Of these major financial service centers,
Tokyo is steadily becoming the most dominant. As Japan's preeminent
financial center, Tokyo (like New York in the United States) is the
focal point of Japans remarkable capital base. The strength of this base
has resulted in Japanese banks, with a 25% share, being the largest
international lender of capital (Norman, 1986). Thus, it is little
surprise that Tokyo is the corporate headquarters of 11 of the world's
50 largest banks. Moreover, the gross national product generated by
Japan dwarfs that of the other Pacific Rim nations combined. in 1981,
Japan generated 69% of the Pacific Rim's gross domestic product (World
Economic Indicators, 1985).
Tokyo's rule as a financial center,
however, has largely been constrained by Japan's strict regulatory
environment. For this reason, Hong Kong, Singapore, and more recently
Sydney have become major financial centers for offshore capital market
activity. Moreover, Hong Kong's and Singapore's historic ties to
international trade and commerce activities and their centralized
location in relation to other Pacific Rim markets, make these centers
appealing locations for establishing the administrative operations of
the largest multinational firms. Further, the reliable and efficient
transportation and communications infrastructure in these cities permits
an intense international flow of people and messages
A survey of the ten largest U.S. banks
highlights the importance of financial and administrative centers in the
Pacific Rim. For each bank, their largest operations are in Tokyo, Hong
Kong, and Singapore, and for three of the banks surveyed equivalent
operations also exist in Sydney. And as centers for administrative
activity, three banks had regional offices in Tokyo, three in Hong Kong,
and Citicorp has regional offices in Tokyo, Hong Kong, and Singapore.
The concentration of the world's largest
financial institutions in these cities encourages further economic
development by acting as a "magnet" for complementary business services.
Firms that provide "producer services" (e.g., advertising, consulting,
law) maintain a physical presence in these locations, reinforcing the
notion that communications technology-supplements rather than
substitutes for face-to-face contact. Indeed, a physical presence
reduces time differential constraints inherent in telephone based
contact, and disruptive time delays involved in long distance travel.
Our analysis of the largest U.S. law
firms shows that 19 firms have a total of 34 branch offices in the
Pacific Rim. The location of these offices is predominantly in Hong
Kong, followed by Singapore and Tokyo. Although the growth of
international financial activity in Tokyo suggests that more law firms
would be expected to have a presence there, Japan's Practicing Attorneys
Act of 1955 severely restricts the presence of foreign lawyers. Thus a
regulatory impediment rather than a market impediment is constraining
the growth of an international legal community in Tokyo. However,
Japan's recent passage of a law allowing entry of foreign lawyers may
change this pattern (New York Times, 1986)
Advertising is an example of another
service drawn to these financial centers. In contrast to law firms,
advertising agencies maintain a presence in these centers to market
products by firms that may or many not be located in these centers. The
essential purpose of a multinational advertising agency is to offer
clients an array of marketing services anywhere in the world. The
exceptional rate of mergers over the last two years underscores the
belief of the largest advertisers that a global network is essential.
After Saatchi & Saatchi Company of London announced its acquisition of
Ted Bates Worldwide to form the world's largest advertising agency,
Donald Zuckert (the New York President of Ted Bates) announced that, "we
now have the resource to deliver to the major global corporations for
which we both work an unmatched depth of client service, creative talent
and media-buying muscle" (Stevenson, 1986).
Let us examine the distribution of the
largest American advertising agencies with branches in the Pacific Rim.
With 19 agencies having 177 branch operations, the development of this
multinational service is far ahead of that for law. More importantly,
their remarkably even distributions within the financial centers of
Pacific Rim nation-states demonstrates the fundamental difference
between a) requiring a physical presence to support the financial
activities that are concentrated in a handful of world cities and b)
requiring a physical presence to access the markets of a nation-state.
Telecommunications and the Growth of
Financial Centers
For multinational service firms, the
value of their operations is closely tied to their ability to
communicate information rapidly and efficiently among geographically
separate sites. Moreover, information traveling among these points is
increasingly in the form of digital communication. And the most
efficient, reliable, and secure means of transmitting digital
communication is via fiber optics. Technological and economic advantages
associated with fiber optics have enabled this technology to be
considered the information user's "digital highway."
The analogy of fiber optics serving as
digital highways stems from the fact that, like highways, fiber optic
corridors are best suited for facilitating high volume point-to-point
traffic (Corrigan. 1986). Thus, at the national level
information-intensive countries like the United States, Canada and
Britain are rapidly installing fiber optic corridors among cities where
the concentration of information service activity is highest.
Ironically, the installation of fiber optic systems often follows
railroad rights-of-way, which formed the backbone of the nineteenth
century transportation infrastructure. With technological improvements
in the laying of fiber optic submarine cables, there is now a rush to
build fiber optic corridors that span both the Atlantic and Pacific
oceans. As is the case for the construction of fiber optic cables within
individual nations, these cables are initially being built to serve
those areas where information intensive activities are greatest.
Telecommunications and
the Pacific Rim
Dramatic increases in trade between
Pacific Rim nations and the United States present a serious challenge to
the existing telecommunications infrastructure. By year-end 1984, 70% of
the transmission to the Pacific Rim was via satellite and 30% via cable.
And by 1987, it is estimated that 76% of transmission will be via
satellite and 24% via cable (Federal Communications Commission, 1980).
Because the Federal Communications Commission considers this dependence
on one medium of transmission to present risks, it has supported the new
Hawaii 4-Transpac-3 (HAV-4/TPC-3) fiber optic system. By 1991, this
system is projected to shift the balance between satellite and cable
traffic to 56% satellite and 44% cable.
Unlike previous cable systems, however,
the orientation of this cable entails both national security as well as
economic interests. The previous cable followed a national security path
from Hawaii to Guam. But the HAW-4/TPC-3 cable incorporates both
national security and economic interests by having the TPC-3 link extend
far into the Pacific where it then branches in two directions (Logue,
1986). The national security link runs to Guam and then on to the
Philippines via a branch called GP-2: the economic and trade connection
extends directly from Hawaii to Japan. By 1990. other key Pacific Rim
centers will be linked via a ring that will connect Guam, the
Philippines, Hong Kong, Korea and Japan. By 1994, Taiwan will also be
connected.
While the design of the network appears
to favor the northern countries of the Pacific Rim, it is important to
note that a cable entitled ANZCAN connects Vancouver, Hawaii, the Fiji
Islands, Sydney and New Zealand. But because this is an analog cable,
the Australian Overseas Telecommunications Commission (OTC) and the New
Zealand Post Office have announced plans to build a 15,150 mile fiber
optic cable which will link these countries to North America by the mid
1990s. At an estimated cost of 1 billion dollars, this project
demonstrates the high stakes of being part of the emerging
telecommunications infrastructure.
In addition to these systems. Pacific
Telecom Inc., Cable and Wireless PLC and a Japanese consortium have
announced plans to lay a fiber optic cable entitled PPAC from Seattle,
Washington to Japan. Along this path, a spur to Alaska may be included
for national security reasons. This system underscores the expected
demand for information-oriented trade links between the United States
and Japan. Indeed, in 1985 Japan accounted for 50% of Pacific Rim Trade
with the United Slates, but only one-third of AT&T's Pacific Rim
circuits linked the Unite States with Japan.
The PPAC cable is also significant
because Cable and Wireless is a British company that was privatized in
1981, and Pacific Telecom is one of the largest non-Bell telephone
companies. As a result, this joint venture represents a key element of
the emerging telecommunications infrastructure that is not dominated by
PTTs or tightly-regulated national monopolies. Unhindered by concerns
for providing universal service, these private corridors are aimed
directly at servicing the multinational corporate user. As Cable and
Wireless' chief executive Sir Eric Sharp has noted. "We don't want to
blanket the world, but we want to be where the action is" (Brown, 1984).
In the case of Cable and Wireless, which
was the original operator of the international telecommunications
services for the crown colonies and other territories, being where the
action is has resulted in its forming a partnership with Teloptik Inc.
to lay a fiber cable across the Atlantic, its leasing and/or development
of fiber optics in the U.S., Canada and Britain, and its operation of
external communications in 36 countries and domestic communications in
16 countries. It is conceivable that Cable and Wireless may be among the
first private carriers to offer a one stop alternative for multinational
corporations (replete with specialized services like packet switching,
electronic mail, and international private leased circuits) by the early
1990s.
The development of several submarine
cables is underway in the Pacific Rim. The recent announcements of the
H-J-K and TASMAN-2 cables demonstrate that fiber optics is now being
installed on an intra-regional level between the most heavily traveled
communication points. Indeed, in 1980. 41% of South Korea's overseas
telecommunications messages were with Japan (Kirby, 1983). Also, as
demonstrated by the lengthy ASEAN cable, one can see how a
communications infrastructure can be used to further the development of
a coalition whose goal is to develop stronger economic and cultural
lies.
Deregulation and Pacific Rim Financial
Centers
Although the growth of world financial
centers is due to a broad array of locational, cultural and economic
factors, financial and telecommunications regulatory systems also affect
the urban development process. In Japan, the gradual loosening of
finance regulations is enabling Tokyo to become a financial center whose
size and power may ultimately rival those in London and New York.
Through such actions as opening up Japan's trust banking to foreign
banks, loosening regulations to permit brisk trading in overseas bond
issues, and allowing six foreign firms membership to the Tokyo Stock
Exchange and 22 additional firms to have non member status, the largest
securities and banking institutions in the world are either opening or
expanding operations in Tokyo (The Economist, 1986). Symbolic of this
growth is the investment bank Morgan Stanley, which opened operations
with a handful of employees in 1984. Since that time, Morgan Stanley has
rapidly expanded their operations and now employs 220 people. If, as
expected, Japan permits an off-shore yen market to develop in Tokyo,
Tokyo's financial center may influence Hong Kong's stature. But a
financial center such as Hong Kong, whose liassez faire regulatory
system and low tax rate will be difficult to match, will continue to
thrive in the future, especially if it serves as the link to western
trade and finance with China (Chira, 1986).
Telecommunications Deregulation and
the Pacific Rim
Whether under the control of a nation's
PPT or a regulated monopoly, the development and management of
telecommunications systems in industrialized countries has typically
pursued the principle of providing affordable and reliable telephone
service to as many locations as possible. But with industrialized
nations becoming increasingly information- rather than
manufacturing-oriented, there is more pressure to allow market rather
than regulatory forces to determine the pattern of telecommunications
investment. For those in favor of deregulation, competition will not
only insure low-cost service for business, but will also encourage
innovation and service diversification (Noam, 1986).
In the United States, deregulation of the
telecommunications industry has led to new investments in inter-city and
intra-city communications systems. Not surprisingly, those cities with
the greatest quotient of information-based service activities are being
linked first as well as having the most diversified intra-city systems
(Moss, 1986).
As one looks toward the Pacific Rim,
Japan has privatized the state-owned Nippon Telegraph and Telephone
(NTT). As a result, new firms such as the Hughs-Mitsui-C. Itoh
partnership are developing systems to compete with NTT. Using
developments within the U.S. as an indicator, the most
information-intensive cities within Japan will reap the largest
benefits. Moreover, these benefits will further facilitate the growth of
information-intensive Japanese cities
At the international level, the emergence
of fiber optic submarine cables as the most cost-effective means of
sending high speed data communication from point-to-point is having
serious ramifications. The International Telecommunications Satellite
Corporation (Intelsat) has historically relied on rate averaging between
high and low volumes of traffic to achieve its primary goal of providing
universal connection. The advent of fiber optic corridors, however, is
threatening the ability of Intelsat to price its satellite services
along heavily congested routes above their true costs. Moreover, the
technological configuration of the Intelsat network has been slow to
incorporate new technologies, such as Ku-band satellite transmission
(Cowley and Aronson, 1985).
These developments are seriously
challenging Intelsat's ability to continue providing universal
connectivity. In an attempt to partially meet this challenge, Intelsat
has deregulated its International Business Services (IBS). For the first
time, private carriers will be allowed to build earth stations and lease
a portion of Intelsat's satellite capacity for the purpose of digitally
transmitting voice, video, and data communication. Ultimately, this
could symbolize a first step in Intelsat facilitating customized
point-to-multipoint services. Indeed, while fiber optics has a
comparative advantage in transmitting point-to-point communication,
satellite transmission is still the preferred medium for
point-to-multipoint communication.
A survey of four common carriers with
plans to offer Pacific Rim IBS in 1986 or 1987 showed that agreements
were initially being reached with the PTTs of Japan, Hong Kong,
Singapore, and Australia. This pattern of development highlights the
concept that the most advanced forms of communication technology migrate
to those areas where the concentration of information service activity
is greatest. As a result, movements toward deregulation will pose a
serious challenge to policy-makers as they attempt to assure the
survival of universal service.
Conclusion
By examining the relationship between the
locational movements of multinational service firms and the emerging
telecommunications infrastructure in the Pacific Rim, this article has
sought to demonstrate that communications technologies are not leading
to urban decline but rather are contributing to the growth of key
financial centers in the Pacific Rim that are the "information hubs" for
multinational firms. Moreover. it points to the increasing importance of
telecommunications in economic development strategies for cities.
Finally, this article highlights the need for business and industry to
recognize the way in which new information and communications
technologies impinge on policies that seek to control financial
activities and telecommunications systems.
References
American Banker (1986).
extrapolated from "Foreign Banking in the U.S." February 14
Brown, Andrew (1981). "A Colonial Vestige
Comes Alive." Fortune, October 29
Chira, Susan (1986). "Tokyo Taking on
Hong Kong." The New York Times, April 21, pg. D1
Crowhey, Peter and Aronson, Jonathan.
"The Great Satellite Shootout." Regulation, May/June1985
pp.27-35.
Corrigan, Richard (1986). "The Fiber
Optics Future." National Journal, June 7, pp. 1371-1374
Dunning, J.H. and Norman F. (1983) "The
Theory of Multinational Enterprise on Application to Multinational
Office Location." Environment and Planning, vol. 15 pp. 675-692
The Economist (1986). "Japanese
Gave Foreign Banks More Than They Bargained For." May 17, 1986
Federal Communications Commission (1986).
Memorandum, Opinion, Order and Automation. File No. 1-1-6-85-219.
June 7, p.9
Kirby Stuart (1983). Towards the
Pacific Century: Economic Development in the Pacific Rim. The
Economist Intelligence Unit, Special Report No. 137 London Hill 3, p. 63
Logue, Timothy (1986) "Recent Major U.S.
Facilities-Related Decisions: Letting a Million Circuits Bloom." in
Wedemeyer, Dan and Pennings, Anthony (eds.) PTC '86 Proceedings.
Pacific Telecommunications Council Hawaii p.78
Moss, Mitchell L. (1986).
"Telecommunications and the Future of Cities." Land Development
Studies. Vol. 3, No. 1. pp. 33-44
Noam, Eli (1986). "Telecommunications
Policy on Both Sides of the Atlantic: Divergence and Outlook." in
Marcellus Snow (ed.), Marketplace for Telecommunications Regulation &
Deregulation in Industrialized Democracies. White Plains, N.Y.
Longman, pp. 255-273
Norman, Peter (1986). "BIS Says Japan has
Passed the US in Share of International Banking." Wall Street Journal,
January 31, p. 12
New York Times (1986). "Lawyers
Await Japanese Rules." July 29
Noyelle, Thierry and Stanback, Thomas
(1983) The Economic Transformation of American Cities. Totowa,
N.J. Rowhan and Allanheld, p.7
Stevenson, Richard (1986). "Ad Agency
Mergers Changing the Business." New York Times, May 13, p. D3
World Economic Indicators
(1985) Business International Corporation, New York, NY
|
 |
Krstafer Pinkerton with fiancé Rosalind.
Pinkerton is a Consultant & Independent ACN Representative
Cell: 808 557 6570 Email |
 |
Vision |
 |
Opportunity |
 |
Ambition |
 |
Integrity |
 |
Success | |